IBM FlashSystem C200

Research Note: IBM FlashSystem C200 High-Capacity Flash Archive

IBM recently announced its FlashSystem C200, a new storage platform integrating 46 TB QLC NAND drives to provide an archive tier within a FlashSystem grid. The C200 expands IBM’s FlashSystem portfolio with a high-density flash solution that competes with traditional nearline HDD storage.

IBM claims the C200 provides flash-like performance with QLC-level economics, enhanced endurance, and seamless grid integration.

The new solution will be generally available on March 21, 2025.

IBM’s FlashSystem CS200

The FlashSystem C200 leverages IBM’s proprietary FlashCore Modules (FCMs) with its Gen 4 technology. The system employs what IBM calls a

“pseudo-SLC” (pSLC) front-end to optimize QLC NAND endurance and performance.

Key specifications of the new offering include:

  • Capacity and Density: The system provides a 1.1 PB raw capacity in a fixed 24-slot 2RU chassis, with 2.3 PB of effective capacity when compression is factored in.
  • Performance Metrics: It delivers 1-2 ms latency, up to 200,000 IOPS, and 23 Gbps throughput.
  • Processing and Memory: The C200 integrates 32 Xeon cores and 256 GB of cache to optimize storage operations.
  • Networking Options: Standard configuration includes 8 x 10GbE ports, with optional support for 8 x 25/10GbE NVMe-TCP and 16 x 32GbE FC/NVMe-FC.
  • Security and Reliability: The system provides always-on encryption and ransomware threat detection, with IBM claiming guaranteed detection within 1 minute.
  • Energy Efficiency and Availability: IBM offers zero downtime guarantees and highlights the system’s energy efficiency.

FlashSystem Grid and Data Mobility

IBM integrates the C200 into its FlashSystem federated grid, enabling non-disruptive Storage Partition migration between systems. The grid structure functions as an intelligent interconnect allowing data mobility and centralized management across storage arrays.

IBM says that the grid maintains metadata integrity and preserves the context of data services such as snapshots, replication, and backup. The C200’s grid compatibility improves storage tiering by ensuring applications operate on the most performant storage layer available.

Analysis

The new IBM FlashSystem C200 is another step forward in the industry’s effort to make high-density flash storage a viable alternative to nearline HDDs.

Competitive implications of the new solution include:

  • HDD Replacement Acceleration: IBM reinforces the argument that flash pricing is approaching HDD economics, challenging the viability of nearline 7.2K RPM disk drives.
  • Threat to HDD-Based Archive Solutions: The C200’s ability to consolidate archive storage into a smaller footprint with lower latency may pressure traditional enterprise HDD vendors, including Western Digital and Seagate.
  • Positioning Against Pure Storage: IBM’s messaging mirrors Pure Storage’s push for all-flash data centers, positioning the C200 as a direct competitor to Pure’s QLC-based capacity-optimized FlashArray solutions.
  • Hybrid Cloud and Enterprise Data Centers: The C200’s integration into the FlashSystem grid makes it attractive for hybrid cloud deployments where data mobility and tiered storage are priorities.

IBM’s FlashSystem C200 is part of the continuing shift towards QLC-based high-capacity storage. Its technical specifications and price positioning make it a compelling alternative for HDD-based archives. IBM remains one of the leading innovators in enterprise storage, and the CS200 continues that trend.

Competitive Outlook & Advice to IT Buyers

The IBM FlashSystem C200 competes directly against QLC-based capacity-optimized enterprise storage solutions from Pure Storage, NetApp, and Dell Technologies…

These sections are only available to NAND Research clients. Please reach out to [email protected] to learn more.

Disclosure: The author is an industry analyst, and NAND Research an industry analyst firm, that engages in, or has engaged in, research, analysis, and advisory services with many technology companies, which may include those mentioned in this article. The author does not hold any equity positions with any company mentioned in this article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *